Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2090 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $140.00 vs $273.18
- Up to 44% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-14700F - $0.59 vs $1.05 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 261 vs 239 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 28 vs 12 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1160 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
261
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
56%
Price, $
$273.18
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $273.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1158 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
12 | Threads | 28 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |