In Atomfall, the Ryzen 5 2600 is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $3 more expensive!
Ryzen 5 2600
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 231 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 19, 2018
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 3% cheaper – $96.99 vs $99.99
- Up to 3% cheaper
- Up to 15% better value in Atomfall – $0.41 vs $0.48/FPS
- Up to 15% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 58 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
207 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
90%
Price, $
$99.99
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
85%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
61%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 5 2600 Apr 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 19th, 2018 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
