In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 5 1600 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 3 3200G. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $34 more expensive!
Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 3% faster in Battlefield 6 – 70 vs 68 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Battlefield 6
Ryzen 3 3200G
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Apr 11, 2017
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 34% cheaper – $65.98 vs $99.99
- Up to 34% cheaper
- Up to 32% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.97 vs $1.42/FPS
- Up to 32% better value in Battlefield 6
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 3 3200G: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 5 1600
Apr 11th, 2017
Average FPS
70 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
65%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
68%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
68 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
51 FPS
98%
Price, $
$65.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 1600
Apr 11th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 5 1600 Apr 11th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 11th, 2017 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $219.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | AM4 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
