The Ryzen 5 1600 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 1600
The Core i9-10900F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i9-10900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 12 threads
Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i9-10900F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 5 1600
Apr 11th, 2017
Average FPS
179
93%
Min 1% FPS
119
94%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, $
$258.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i9-10900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 1600
Apr 11th, 2017
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
16 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
69%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 5 1600 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$219.00 | MSRP | $464.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
| 16 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
