Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 912 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $78.90 vs $359.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-12900F - $0.47 vs $1.88 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 13% better in God of War than Ryzen 3 3200G - 191 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 24 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
169
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1869 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
25%
Price, $
$359.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $359.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1867 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |