The Ryzen 3 3200G is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-4690K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $25.90 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 65 vs 88 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-4690K
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 32% cheaper – $54.00 vs $79.90
- A better value for money for gaming
Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-4690K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-4690K
Jun 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
690
100%
Min 1% FPS
379
100%
Price, $
$54
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-4690K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-4690K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-4690K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-4690K
Jun 2nd, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
98%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-4690K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $243.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
| Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
65 W | Power Consumption | 88 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
