The Ryzen 3 3200G is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-6100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $49.91 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
The Core i3-6100 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i3-6100
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 62% cheaper – $29.99 vs $79.90
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i3-6100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
202
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, $
$29.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i3-6100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i3-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i3-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
