Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 5355 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Monster Hunter: World than Phenom II X4 925 - 281 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 28 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
281
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$269.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $269.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Deneb | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |