Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 4287 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of Phenom II X4 810
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 19% better in Elden Ring than Phenom II X4 810 - 130 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 32 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$343.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $343.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Deneb | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |