The Pentium G645 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-4790 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $46.43 cheaper!
Advantages of the Pentium G645
- Up to 53% cheaper – $40.99 vs $87.42
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 65 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-4790
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Pentium G645 vs Core i7-4790 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Pentium G645
Sep 2nd, 2012
Average FPS
167
92%
Min 1% FPS
112
93%
Price, $
$40.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Core i7-4790
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
182
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, $
$87.42
46%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
50%
Pentium G645 vs Core i7-4790 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Pentium G645 vs Core i7-4790 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Pentium G645 vs Core i7-4790 in core CPU performance specifications
Pentium G645
Sep 2nd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-4790
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Pentium G645 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-4790 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Not Available | MSRP | $312.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
65 W | Power Consumption | 84 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
3 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |