In Control, the Pentium G620 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Pentium G620
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 65 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 247 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs May 22, 2011
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Pentium G620 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$850
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.44/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Pentium G620 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Pentium G620 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in core CPU performance specifications
Pentium G620
May 22nd, 2011
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Pentium G620 May 22nd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $999.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | SP3r2 |
65W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
