Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Pentium G4620
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $149.99 vs $849.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-13400F - $0.31 vs $1.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 40% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Pentium G4620 - 672 vs 479 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
479
71%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7428 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
672
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
25%
Price, $
$849.99
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7428 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4620 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |