In Atomfall, the Pentium G4560 is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $505 cheaper!
Pentium G4560
- Up to 95% cheaper – $28.57 vs $534.00
- Up to 95% cheaper
- Up to 93% better value in Atomfall – $0.14 vs $2.15/FPS
- Up to 93% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 25 days newer – Jan 28, 2025 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 8 years and 25 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Pentium G4560 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Pentium G4560
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
192 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
77%
Price, $
$28.57
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 28th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$534
5%
Value, $/FPS
$2.15/FPS
7%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Pentium G4560 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Pentium G4560 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Pentium G4560
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
38%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 28th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Pentium G4560 Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 28th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 28th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
51W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
