In The Last of Us Part II, the Pentium G3220 is faster than the Core Ultra 9 285 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $548 cheaper!
Pentium G3220
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 195 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 97% cheaper – $15.45 vs $563.41
- Up to 97% cheaper
- Up to 98% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.07 vs $3.31/FPS
- Up to 98% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Pentium G3220 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Pentium G3220
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
195 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
146 FPS
100%
Price, $
$15.45
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
170 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
87%
Price, $
$563.41
2%
Value, $/FPS
$3.31/FPS
2%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Pentium G3220 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Pentium G3220 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Pentium G3220
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Pentium G3220 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
