In Atomfall, the Pentium B960 is slightly slower than the FX-8300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Pentium B960
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
FX-8300
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 190 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 21 days newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Oct 02, 2011
- Is 1 year and 21 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Pentium B960 vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
190 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Pentium B960 vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Pentium B960 vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Pentium B960
Oct 2nd, 2011
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Pentium B960 Oct 2nd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 2nd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM3+ |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
