In Control, the Pentium B950 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Pentium B950
- Consumes up to 90% less energy – 35 vs 350 Watts
- Consumes up to 90% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
- Up to 4% faster in Control – 254 vs 244 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Control
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer – Oct 19, 2023 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Pentium B950 vs Ryzen Threadripper 7960X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
Oct 19th, 2023
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1109.82
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Pentium B950 vs Ryzen Threadripper 7960X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
Oct 19th, 2023
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2829
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
23537
100%
Performance Specifications
The Pentium B950 vs Ryzen Threadripper 7960X in core CPU performance specifications
Pentium B950
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
2 MB
2%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
Oct 19th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Pentium B950 Jun 19th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 7960X Oct 19th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $1,499.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | sTR5 |
35W | Power Consumption | 350W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
