In GRID, the Pentium B950 is same performance as the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Pentium B950
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 35 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer – Aug 31, 2017 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer
GRID FPS Calculator
Pentium B950 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Average FPS
483 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
291 FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Pentium B950 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Pentium B950 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in core CPU performance specifications
Pentium B950
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Pentium B950 Jun 19th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Aug 31st, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | SP3r2 |
35W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
