In Atomfall, the Pentium B950 is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Pentium B950
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 35% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 35% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 4 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 13 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Pentium B950 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Pentium B950 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Pentium B950 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Pentium B950
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
2 MB
7%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Pentium B950 Jun 19th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
