In Atomfall, the Opteron 3365 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5645. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Opteron 3365
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Jun 29, 2013 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5645
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 189 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Opteron 3365 vs Xeon E5645: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Opteron 3365 vs Xeon E5645 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Opteron 3365 vs Xeon E5645 in core CPU performance specifications
Opteron 3365
Jun 29th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Opteron 3365 Jun 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1366 |
65W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
