In Rust, the Opteron 3365 is same performance as the FX-8300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Opteron 3365
- Is 8 months and 6 days newer – Jun 30, 2013 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 8 months and 6 days newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
FX-8300
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Opteron 3365 vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Opteron 3365 vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Opteron 3365 vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Opteron 3365
Jun 30th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Opteron 3365 Jun 30th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 30th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM3+ |
65W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
