In Atomfall, the Opteron 3365 is slightly faster than the Celeron 847. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Opteron 3365
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 188 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 11 days newer – Jun 30, 2013 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 2 years and 11 days newer
Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Opteron 3365 vs Celeron 847: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Opteron 3365 vs Celeron 847 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Opteron 3365 vs Celeron 847 in core CPU performance specifications
Opteron 3365
Jun 30th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
48%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Opteron 3365 Jun 30th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 30th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 19th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| AM3+ | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 65W | Power Consumption | 17W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
