Key Differences
In short — Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Xeon X5690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core Ultra 9 185H is 4686 days newer than Xeon X5690.
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
- Performs up to 29% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon X5690 - 129 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5690 - 22 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon X5690
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Core Ultra 9 185H
Mobile • Dec 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5690 | vs | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 14th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ultra 9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | METEOR LAKE |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 2049 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 22 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 128EU |
| No | Overclockable | No |
