Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 3859 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 51% better in Rust than Xeon X5675 - 236 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5675 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Single-Core
499
21.714534377719758%
Multi-Core
2394
23.956769738817172%
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| Xeon | Collection | Xeon E |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
