Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 3026 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 12% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon X5675 - 176 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Xeon E |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 45 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
No | Overclockable | No |