Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11260H outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11260H is 3739 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11260H
- Performs up to 7% better in The Outer Worlds than Xeon X5675 - 208 vs 195 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Core i5-11260H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i5-11260H |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
