Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 8640U outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 8640U is 4678 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
- Performs up to 31% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon X5675 - 152 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 28 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Ryzen 5 8640U
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Single-Core
499
20.104754230459307%
Multi-Core
2394
27.30071843995895%
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
