Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 3065 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Xeon X5675 - 270 vs 253 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
270
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |