Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon X5670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 4578 days newer than Xeon X5670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5670
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 21% better in Deathloop than Xeon X5670 - 203 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5670 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$489.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $489.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58463 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
482
16.20712844653665%
Multi-Core
2257
11.202104427238435%
Intel Xeon X5670 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |