Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 3361 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon X5650 - 132 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Xeon E |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
