Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 4677 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 15% better in F1 22 than Xeon X5650 - 289 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
