Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 3026 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 6% better in Fortnite than Xeon W3690 - 227 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 45 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon W3690
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Xeon E |
| Gulftown | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
