Key Differences
In short — Xeon W3690 outperforms Core i5-2537M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W3690 is 13 days newer than Core i5-2537M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3690
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-2537M - 169 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2537M - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2537M
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 17 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon W3690
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Core i5-2537M
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | Intel Core i5-2537M |
|---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 1st, 2011 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Gulftown | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 17 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
