Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3065 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon W3690 - 120 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3690 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $79.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Gulftown | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |