Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3852 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 21% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon W3670 - 191 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3670 - 65 vs 130 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3670 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |