Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3532 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon W3670 - 176 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3670 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$97.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $97.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3670 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |