Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7640HS is 4533 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
- Performs up to 40% better in New World than Xeon W3670 - 139 vs 99 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3670 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon W3670
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Ryzen 5 7640HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3670
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Single-Core
516
22.30869001297017%
Multi-Core
2333
25.850415512465375%
Intel Xeon W3670 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 43.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
