Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 3377 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3565
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 130 vs 255 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon W3565 - 243 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3565 - 56 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3565
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Xeon W |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 3647 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 28 |
| 8 | Threads | 56 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 255 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
