Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10750H outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10750H is 3805 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10750H
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon W3565 - 168 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon W3565 - 45 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3565 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3565 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon W3565
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Core i7-10750H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | Intel Core i7-10750H |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
