Key Differences
In short — Xeon W3565 outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W3565 is 672 days older than Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3565
- Performs up to 3% better in War Thunder than Celeron G540 - 132 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3565 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3565 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
128
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3000 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Bloomfield | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |