Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 4237 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon W3550 - 204 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3550 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3550 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8871 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |