Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 4106 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 23% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon W3550 - 193 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3550 - 24 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$261.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $261.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |