Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Xeon W3530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3698 days newer than Xeon W3530.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon W3530 - 175 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3530 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3530 - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3530 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |