Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Xeon W3530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 3541 days newer than Xeon W3530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3530
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 130 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 10% better in God of War than Xeon W3530 - 178 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3530 - 48 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1234.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,234.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3530 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 280 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |