Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 4663 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 70% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon W3520 - 235 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
235
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$393
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $393 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |