Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 4369 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 25% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon W3520 - 209 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$265
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1466 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |