Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3245 outperforms Core i5-11400H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3245
Performs up to 6% better in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive than Core i5-11400H - 709 vs 671 FPS
Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400H - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3245 - 45 vs 205 Watts
Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3245 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Resolution
1920x1080
Game Graphics
High
FPS in TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920x1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3245 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Not Available | Collection | Core i5 |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| FCLGA3647 | Socket | Intel BGA 1499 |
| Segment | Mobile | |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 205 W | TDP | 45 W |
| Not Available | Process Size | 10 nm |
| Not Available | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
