Buy on Amazon
$39
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2999
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 757 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 8% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G3930T - 298 vs 275 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 56 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 35 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65398 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
37.20298710115411%
Multi-Core
948
6.914660831509847%
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 2 |
56 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 255 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.