Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2999
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 2249 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 15% better in Valorant than Celeron G1610 - 783 vs 681 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 56 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 55 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65395 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
28.920570264765782%
Multi-Core
739
5.3902261123267685%
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 2 |
56 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 255 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.