Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 2347 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-4130 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 56 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 125 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65398 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Xeon W | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 4 |
56 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
255 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |