Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Xeon W-2125 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 975 days newer than Xeon W-2125.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 3% better in Deathloop than Xeon W-2125 - 182 vs 177 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2125 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W-2125 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2125 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9057 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2125 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |